Friday, 4 October 2013
JKT yaongeza nafasi kwa vijana kwa mujibu wa sheria
Na Jimmy Mfuru
3rd October 2013B-pepeChapa
Askari wanafunzi (makuruta) wakiimba wimbo baada ya mufunzo ya kijeshiJeshi la Kujenga Taifa (JKT) limetangaza kuongeza idadi ya vijana 5,278 kwa wahitimu waliomaliza kidato cha sita wanaotakiwa kujiunga na mafunzo hayo kwa awamu ya tatu katika kambi zake kwa mujibu wa sheria.
Kwa mujibu wa tangazo lilitolewa kwenye tovuti ya jeshi hilo jana
Thursday, 19 September 2013
JK warns Tanzanians caught trafficking drugs
'My government shall not defend them'
By The guardian reporter
19th September 2013

President Jakaya Kikwete greets Tanzanians living
in California, yesterday, during his ongoing official visit to the US.
(Photo: State House)
Addressing Tanzanians living in San Francisco, California, President Kikwete made it clear that his government shall not in any way defend nationals apprehended in drug deals anywhere in the world.
“If you are arrested for being involved in the drug business, the government shall not in any way defend you because the laws of different countries prohibit this hideous business,” he said.
He added: “We cannot continue to be branded a country of drug dealers. The government can only defend nationals living abroad if they are mistreated, but not for being involved in drug business, rape or any other criminal acts,” the President said during his two-day official visit to California, in the US.
His remarks are based on the fact that drug trafficking business is illegal in most countries in the world.
The President’s remarks come after the recent arrest of a number of Tanzanians in different countries over allegations of drug trafficking.
He called on Tanzanians living in the Diaspora to respect the laws in their countries of residence.
“It is imperative to behave as good citizens. You decided on your own to come and live here. You should therefore know that these countries have their own laws. If you decide to become bad citizens – as the British say – ‘You will face the music’. And sometimes the music that you will face may not be enjoyable,” he warned.
In another development, President Kikwete told Diaspora Tanzanians that he was not sure if the issue of dual citizenship would have room in the new Constitution.
This, he said, is due to the fact that the issue is not in the Draft Constitution currently being debated back home.
However, he said, the ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM) has simply proposed that that the issue of dual citizenship should have a place in the new Constitution.
“As CCM we discussed the issue of dual citizenship and treated it is as a new proposal. We want it to be discussed but we are not sure whether it will have a place in the second draft or not,” he said.
He added: “We shall keep pushing it though, but to be sincere, it is not an issue that is likely to gather much support since very few Tanzanians live in the Diaspora,” he explained.
Meanwhile, President Kikwete has said Tanzania cannot continue to depend on donations in its struggle to fast track the country’s development.
To ensure that Tanzania speeds up development, the country has started appointing goodwill ambassadors in various countries.
“We cannot continue to be a country that depends on donations. We have relied on donations for a long time and we think now it is enough. We have to change and rely on big investments and businesses between Tanzania and other countries in the world,” he said at the official investiture of Ahmed Nassoro Issa Al Qasimi as Tanzania’s goodwill ambassador to California on Monday.
According to President Kikwete, the duty of a goodwill ambassador is to represent Tanzania’s interests in the country of accreditation.
He said Tanzania's policy is to have many such envoys, especially in economically rich countries where the official ambassador alone is not enough.
SOURCE:
THE GUARDIAN
Sunday, 15 September 2013
Why constitution writing process is getting complicated
The way the Constitutional Review (Amendment) Bill of 2013 has been passed in the just ended Parliament session which had this proposed legislation as one of the important items on its loaded agenda, has definitely left keen observers wondering whether we are still on the right track as far as our desire to bring effective constitutional changes is concerned.
Optimists in our midst are simply saying “let us wait and see” while doubting Thomases contend that the future is not all that promising, and if we are not careful we may end up delivering a still-born constitutional baby. Is there any rationale for what some of our leaders describe as unnecessary and uncalled for worries?
The Constitutional Review (amendment) legislation of 2013 is important in this process as it is about the setup of the Constitutional Assembly and how the vital link in this national project will operate to come up with the final draft of the eagerly awaited mother law of the land.
The fact that nearly all the MPs belonging to the major opposition political parties walked out of Parliament during voting time on the bill does not portend well for the remaining crucial part of the constitution writing homework.
The Minister for Constitutional and Legal Affairs considers the incident named as storm in a tea cup, arguing that after all the opposition legislators participated in debating the bill, and therefore their declining to vote is not a big deal.
Observers note that much as some leaders in government might downplay this incident, it is likely to have a serious impact on the remaining part of the new constitution writing exercise - especially if the legislators continue to be driven by partisanship along political party lines instead of national interests as they deliberate on these issues.
As the saying goes, a divided house does not stand. Come November this year and another bill on how to conduct a referendum on the new constitution is likely to be tabled in parliament – that is if nothing intervenes to disrupt the schedule put in place to ensure the exercise is concluded by next year. Unless the wounds developed while debating and endorsing the latest bill are healed, then chances are that a replay of the absurd theatre we have witnessed during the August Parliamentary session is inevitable.
One of the things which are certain here is that the issues which have divided our legislators on this legislation can’t simply go away.
The opposition camp thinks the law which seems designed to ensure that in the end the ruling party is likely to enjoy the support of two thirds of the Constitutional Assembly members, after including legislators In the Union Parliament and members of Zanzibar House of Representatives, as well giving powers to the President to have a final say on candidates proposed by other stakeholders, is nothing but a Machiavellian move.
In other words, they smell a rat and will continue to be suspicious until what will transpire during the Constitutional Assembly sessions proves them wrong. Those who read developments of this nature between the lines realize that this is the main bone of contention, and allegations that Zanzibar was not given the opportunity to provide some inputs in the controversial law may simply be a strategy to get support from the isles.
The war of words among politicians as they air views on the constitutional process is also not encouraging consensus among political players as we move to the vital higher steps in this serious undertaking.
For example, of late one of the famous propagandists in the country has been busy telling the World how one of the political parties is on the payroll of foreign governments to do the dirty work of disrupting the constitution making project.
Such wild claims, which under normal circumstances would attract the attention of law enforcers, simply create tension and animosity among political parties which are expected to work together at this critical moment in the country’s history.
Another observation which proves that politicians are determined to mess up the constitution making process is the continuation of platform campaigns, where they seek to influence members of the public to take specific positions on the controversial issues like the union government setup.
This kind of situation is not desirable, but we can’t do much about it. It is all part of the birth pangs of the envisaged new supreme law of our beloved country. With the kind of environment, constitution writing will continue to be complicated.
SOURCE: GUARDIAN ON SUNDAY
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)